IDT100x
Instructional Design and Technology: Learning Theory
Exploring the evolution of learning theories, from traditional behavior-based approaches to the emerging understanding of how social engagement can enhance the learning process
Navigation Menu
WEEK 1
I believe in the power of sharing knowledge and supporting others in their creative and learning design journeys. By using a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, I'm allowing fellow educators, designers, and organizations to freely use and adapt my work as long as they credit me.
WEEK 2
Behaviorism
Behaviorism emerged in the early 20th century as a psychological theory focused on observable behaviors rather than internal mental states. John Watson established the foundation in 1913 with his "Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It," arguing that psychology should study only measurable behaviors. B.F. Skinner later advanced the theory through operant conditioning, demonstrating how consequences shape behavior through reinforcement and punishment.
​
Key researchers include Ivan Pavlov, Edward Thorndike, and Albert Bandura. In education, behaviorism manifests through structured curricula, immediate feedback systems, and measurable learning outcomes. The theory assumes learning occurs when desired behaviors are reinforced consistently, making it particularly effective for skill acquisition and habit formation.
​
Implications for Instructional Design
Behaviorism directly influences instructional design through several core principles. Learning objectives must specify observable, measurable behaviors rather than abstract concepts. Assessment focuses on performance demonstration, requiring learners to show they can execute specific tasks. Reinforcement schedules become critical design elements, with immediate feedback reinforcing correct responses and correcting errors promptly.
​
Content sequencing follows a logical progression from simple to complex behaviors, allowing learners to build competency incrementally. This approach works particularly well for procedural knowledge and skills-based training where clear right and wrong answers exist. The theory emphasizes practice and repetition, making it valuable for developing automaticity in essential skills.
​
Strengths and Limitations in Mental Health Training
In developing mental health training like my OCD minicourse, behaviorism offers distinct advantages and notable limitations. The theory's emphasis on observable behaviors aligns perfectly with teaching my minicourse on Exposure Response Prevention (ERP), where success depends on measurable actions—whether someone completes exposure exercises or resists compulsions.
​
Strengths:
-
Clear performance indicators for skill mastery
-
Structured progression through anxiety hierarchies
-
Immediate feedback on technique implementation
-
Measurable outcomes for treatment effectiveness
​
Limitations:
-
Limited attention to internal cognitive processes crucial for understanding OCD
-
Insufficient emphasis on emotional regulation and metacognitive awareness
-
Potential oversimplification of complex psychological phenomena
-
Reduced focus on individual meaning-making and personal insight
​
Mental health interventions require understanding both behavioral changes and underlying thought patterns, making behaviorism alone insufficient for comprehensive treatment approaches.
​
Learning Scenario: Corporate Cybersecurity Training
Context: A technology company needs employees to consistently follow secure password creation protocols to prevent data breaches.
​
Learning Objective: Employees will demonstrate secure password creation by generating passwords that meet all company security criteria in 90% of attempts during simulated account creation scenarios.
​
Stimulus: Employees receive a prompt to create a new password for a simulated work application. The system displays security requirements (12+ characters, mixed case, numbers, symbols, no personal information).
​
Observable Behaviors:
-
Selecting appropriate password length
-
Including required character types
-
Avoiding dictionary words and personal information
-
Using unique passwords for different accounts
-
Completing password creation within specified timeframes
​
Response: Employees input password choices into the training system, which immediately evaluates compliance with security protocols.
​
Positive Reinforcement:
-
Immediate visual confirmation (green checkmark) when requirements are met
-
Point accumulation toward cybersecurity certification
-
Recognition badges for consecutive successful password creations
-
Reduced mandatory training frequency for consistent performers
​
Negative Reinforcement:
-
Removal of restrictive system warnings once secure passwords are created
-
Elimination of additional security modules upon demonstrating competency
-
Reduced monitoring frequency for employees showing consistent secure behavior
​
Assessment: Learning success is measured by password creation accuracy rates, time to completion, and sustained secure behavior over a 30-day monitoring period. Employees must demonstrate the target behavior consistently before advancing to more complex cybersecurity modules.
WEEK 3
Cognitivism
Cognitivism emerged in the 1950s as a response to behaviorism's limitations, focusing on internal mental processes rather than just observable behaviors. The "cognitive revolution" began with researchers like George Miller (1956) who demonstrated working memory constraints, and Ulric Neisser (1967) who coined the term "cognitive psychology."
​
Key figures include Jerome Bruner of discovery learning (1960s), David Ausubel of meaningful learning theory (1968), and Richard Mayer of multimedia learning principles (1990s). More recently, John Sweller developed Cognitive Load Theory (1988), while Richard Clark and Ruth Colvin Clark advanced evidence-based instructional design practices.
​
Cognitivism views learners as active information processors who construct knowledge by organizing, storing, and retrieving information through schemas. Unlike behaviorism's stimulus-response model, cognitivism emphasizes how learners perceive, process, and retain information. This theory recognizes that learning involves complex mental operations including attention, encoding, storage, and retrieval processes.
​
Implications for Instructional Design
Cognitive theory fundamentally reshapes instructional design by prioritizing how information is presented and processed. Designers must consider working memory limitations, which can only hold 7±2 pieces of information simultaneously. This constraint demands careful sequencing and chunking of content to prevent cognitive overload.
​
Schema theory suggests learners organize knowledge in interconnected networks, making prior knowledge assessment crucial for effective instruction. New information must connect to existing schemas or help learners construct new ones. This principle drives the use of advance organizers, concept maps, and scaffolding techniques.
​
Cognitive Load Theory introduces three types of mental processing: intrinsic load (essential content complexity), extraneous load (poor instructional design), and germane load (schema construction). Effective design minimizes extraneous load while optimizing germane load to promote deep learning.
​
Strengths and Limitations in Mental Health Training
For mental health training contexts like my OCD minicourse, cognitivism offers significant advantages while presenting specific challenges.
​
Strengths:
-
Emphasis on internal thought processes aligns with cognitive-behavioral therapy principles
-
Schema theory supports building comprehensive understanding of OCD mechanisms
-
Cognitive load principles help manage anxiety-inducing content presentation
-
Focus on meaningful learning promotes lasting therapeutic skill development
​
Limitations:
-
Potential underemphasis on emotional and motivational factors crucial in mental health
-
Limited attention to social and cultural influences on learning and healing
-
Risk of overwhelming anxious learners with too much cognitive processing
-
Insufficient consideration of trauma-informed learning approaches​
​
Instructional Material Example:
YouTube Video by Devlin Peck: The ARCS Model of Motivation by John Keller (Click to view)
​
Context: This instructional design video by Devlin Peck demonstrates professional training concepts through multiple presentation formats. Peck uses varied instructional techniques including direct presentation, screencasting, and explanatory voiceovers to teach instructional design principles to industry professionals.
​
Assessment: Peck demonstrates strong cognitive load management through strategic segmentation and multimedia design principles. His varied presentation formats and purposeful pacing effectively manage working memory limitations while maintaining learner engagement. However, the passive video format limits opportunities for active knowledge construction, reducing the germane cognitive load essential for deep learning and schema development.
WEEK 4
Constructivism
Constructivism emerged from cognitive psychology in the mid-20th century, fundamentally shifting focus from knowledge transmission to knowledge construction. Jean Piaget established foundational principles in the 1950s through his cognitive development theory, demonstrating how learners actively build understanding through interaction with their environment.
​
Lev Vygotsky expanded the theory in the 1960s-70s with social constructivism, introducing the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) and emphasizing collaborative learning. Jerome Bruner advanced discovery learning approaches (1960s), while Seymour Papert developed constructionism in the 1980s, focusing on learning through creating artifacts.
​
Contemporary researchers include Ernst von Glasersfeld (radical constructivism, 1990s) and Richard Mayer (guided discovery learning, 2000s). Constructivism views learners as active meaning-makers who build knowledge through experience, reflection, and social interaction. Learning occurs when individuals construct new understanding by connecting experiences to existing cognitive frameworks, making the process inherently personal and contextual.
​
Implications for Instructional Design
Constructivism transforms instructional design from content delivery to experience facilitation. Designers must create environments where learners actively explore, experiment, and construct meaning rather than passively receive information. This approach emphasizes authentic tasks that mirror real-world contexts, allowing learners to develop transferable skills through meaningful practice.
​
The theory demands flexible learning pathways that accommodate individual construction processes. Unlike linear instructional sequences, constructivist design supports multiple routes to understanding, recognizing that learners build knowledge differently based on prior experiences and cognitive structures.
Assessment shifts from measuring recall to evaluating application and construction processes. Designers must create opportunities for learners to demonstrate understanding through projects, performances, and reflective exercises that reveal thinking processes rather than just final products.
​
Strengths and Limitations in Mental Health Training
For mental health education contexts like my OCD minicourse, constructivism offers unique advantages while presenting specific implementation challenges.
​
Cognitive Behavioral training particular, like that of the Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) therapy that my course teaches, requires both personal meaning-making and adherence to proven therapeutic approaches, making pure constructivism alone insufficient for comprehensive skill development.
​
Strengths:
-
Emphasis on personal meaning-making aligns with therapeutic goal-setting and motivation
-
Social construction supports peer learning and reduces stigma through shared experiences
-
Active learning promotes deeper understanding of complex psychological concepts
-
Authentic problem-solving develops practical coping skills rather than theoretical knowledge
​
Limitations:
-
Potential inefficiency when learners need foundational knowledge before construction
-
Risk of misconception development without adequate guidance and correction
-
Difficulty ensuring comprehensive coverage of evidence-based therapeutic techniques
-
Challenge of balancing individual construction with standardized treatment protocols
​
Instructional Material Example
​Learning Scenario: Personal ERP Toolkit Construction
(For more information, please refer to the IDD here.)
Context: Adult learners with OCD progress through an asynchronous online course module where they construct personalized Exposure Response Prevention (ERP) toolkits by exploring diverse case studies, experimenting with hierarchy-building tools, and reflecting on their personal OCD patterns.
Learning Objective: Learners will construct comprehensive, personalized ERP toolkits by analyzing diverse OCD scenarios, experimenting with exposure hierarchy creation, and synthesizing insights through guided reflection and optional peer interaction.
​
Constructivist Elements:
-
Learners begin by exploring interactive case studies within Storyline modules, each presenting different OCD presentations and exposure approaches. Rather than being told the "correct" hierarchy, learners actively construct understanding by manipulating variables, testing different exposure sequences, and observing outcomes through scenario-based simulations.
-
Using progressively less-structured templates, learners experiment with building their own exposure hierarchies. Initial templates provide detailed guidance and examples, while later versions offer minimal scaffolding, allowing learners to construct increasingly sophisticated approaches based on their developing understanding.
-
Through guided journal reflections and optional discussion forum participation, learners synthesize their learning, connect concepts to personal experiences, and refine their constructed toolkits based on ongoing experimentation and peer insights.
​​
Zone of Proximal Development Skills
-
Anxiety Tolerance Assessment: Learners can identify their current anxiety levels but cannot independently calibrate appropriate exposure intensities for optimal therapeutic progress. With guidance, they can learn to balance challenge with manageability.
-
Peer Feedback Integration: Learners can recognize valuable insights from others but struggle to synthesize multiple perspectives into coherent personal strategies. Scaffolding helps them evaluate, prioritize, and integrate diverse input effectively.
-
Exposure Progression Planning: Learners understand basic exposure concepts but cannot independently sequence exposures for optimal skill building. Collaborative construction enables them to develop sophisticated progression strategies.
​
Scaffolding and Social Constructivism Strategies
Scaffolding Strategy: Progressive Exposure Templates
-
Provide structured templates that gradually reduce in specificity as learners develop competence.
-
Initial templates include detailed prompts, examples, and decision trees.
-
As learners demonstrate understanding, templates become more open-ended, eventually transitioning to blank frameworks that learners populate independently.
-
​
Social Constructivist Approach: Peer Exposure Partnerships
-
Establish accountability partnerships where learners support each other's exposure practice between sessions.
-
Partners share progress, troubleshoot challenges, and celebrate successes through structured check-ins.
-
This approach leverages social construction while providing mutual support and motivation.
-
​
Differentiation Strategies:
-
Anxiety Sensitivity Levels: Provide multiple entry points based on current anxiety management skills, offering more intensive scaffolding for highly anxious learners
-
Learning Preferences: Include visual, auditory, and kinesthetic construction opportunities through mind mapping, discussion forums, and hands-on simulation activities
-
Cultural Considerations: Incorporate culturally responsive examples and acknowledge diverse family dynamics that influence exposure implementation
-
Technology Comfort: Offer both high-tech collaborative tools and low-tech alternatives to ensure all learners can participate meaningfully
WEEK 5
Connectivism
Connectivism emerged in the early 2000s as a learning theory for the digital age, developed by George Siemens (2005) and later expanded by Stephen Downes. Siemens introduced connectivism in his paper "Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age," arguing that traditional learning theories couldn't explain learning in our networked, technology-rich world.
​
Key researchers include George Siemens (network learning theory, 2005), Stephen Downes (distributed knowledge and connectivist MOOCs, 2006), and Dave Cormier (rhizomatic learning, 2008). Contemporary contributors include Jenny Mackness, Marielle Patronis, and Rita Kop, who have explored how connectivist ideas work in practice.
​
Connectivism says that learning happens through networks of connections between people, information, and resources. Unlike earlier theories that focus on what happens inside individual minds, connectivism emphasizes that knowledge exists in the network itself, not just within people. Learning becomes the ability to build and navigate networks, spot patterns, and make connections across different information sources. The theory recognizes that knowledge becomes outdated quickly, requiring constant updating and connection-making in our rapidly changing world.
​
Implications for Instructional Design
Connectivism shifts instructional design from delivering content to facilitating networks. Designers become network architects, creating spaces where learners can connect with peers, experts, and information sources. This approach focuses on developing learners' ability to filter, evaluate, and combine information from multiple sources rather than mastering predetermined content.
​
Assessment changes from measuring what people remember to evaluating how well they make connections. Learners show understanding by creating networks, collecting resources, and contributing to collective knowledge creation. The theory requires open, flexible learning systems that can adapt to new knowledge and changing professional landscapes.
​
Technology integration becomes essential, not an add-on. Learning management systems evolve into personal learning environments (PLEs) where learners control their learning paths, connect with global networks, and contribute to shared knowledge creation. Social media, wikis, and collaboration platforms become primary learning tools rather than extras.
​
Strengths and Limitations in Mental Health Training
For mental health education contexts like my OCD minicourse, connectivism offers real advantages while presenting challenges specific to therapeutic learning environments.
​
Mental health education requires careful balance between open peer learning and clinical supervision, making connectivism most effective when combined with professional oversight and evidence-based therapeutic frameworks.
​
Strengths:
-
Peer support networks reduce stigma and isolation commonly experienced by individuals with mental health conditions
-
Diverse lived experiences create rich knowledge collections that complement clinical expertise
-
Ongoing connection-making supports sustained recovery through community engagement
-
Global networking provides access to varied cultural approaches to mental health and coping strategies
-
Crowdsourced coping methods and success stories offer practical, tested approaches beyond traditional clinical protocols
​
Limitations:
-
Risk of misinformation spreading without professional oversight in peer-generated content
-
Potential triggering content when individuals share detailed personal struggles without moderation
-
Privacy and confidentiality concerns when discussing sensitive mental health experiences in open networks
-
Difficulty maintaining therapeutic boundaries in informal peer-support networks
-
Challenge of ensuring evidence-based practice when individuals prioritize peer advice over professional guidance
​
Personal Learning Network (PLN) Development
#1: The Learning Guild (https://www.learningguild.com/)
The Learning Guild (formerly eLearning Guild) comprises the largest and most influential group of learning professionals worldwide, serving as a community of practice for designers, developers, and managers of e-Learning. The organization offers instructional design and eLearning conferences, symposiums, classes, and online forums specifically focused on eLearning management, design, and development.
​
The Learning Guild provides access to research on emotional learning design, trauma-informed instructional approaches, and accessibility standards crucial for mental health education. Their conferences offer opportunities to connect with instructional designers who specialize in healthcare training and sensitive topic delivery. The organization's focus on scenario-based learning directly supports therapeutic skill development through realistic practice environments. For my OCD minicourse, their resources on branching scenarios and interactive simulations align with exposure therapy principles, while their accessibility guidelines ensure inclusive design for learners with varying anxiety levels and cognitive processing needs.
​
#2: Cathy Moore (Blog and Action Mapping Resources)
(https://blog.cathy-moore.com/)
​
Cathy Moore is an internationally recognized training designer who created the action mapping model of training design used by companies worldwide. Her approach focuses on starting with measurable goals and working outward, helping designers solve performance problems through realistic practice activities rather than information presentations.
​
I first learned about Cathy Moore's work through instructional design influencer Devlin Peck. Reading her book "Map It: The Hands-On Guide to Strategic Training Design" fundamentally changed my approach—shifting from asking "How can I make this content interesting?" to "What specific behaviors need to change?" This proved invaluable for my OCD minicourse, focusing on the actions learners need during exposure exercises rather than just OCD facts.
​
Moore's action mapping approach supports therapeutic training by emphasizing behavior change over knowledge transfer—critical for mental health education. Her focus on authentic practice activities aligns with exposure therapy principles, while her collaborative design process offers guidance for working with mental health professionals to ensure clinical accuracy and practical application of coping strategies.
​
Network Learning Applications
These PLN entities demonstrate connectivism principles specifically relevant to mental health education. The Learning Guild shows how professional networks can support specialized healthcare training through shared expertise in sensitive topic delivery and trauma-informed design. Their member-generated content includes case studies and best practices for creating safe learning environments—critical for anxiety-prone learners.
​
Cathy Moore's network illustrates how expert methodology can transform therapeutic education by emphasizing behavior change over information transfer. Her action mapping approach embodies connectivist principles through collaborative design processes that include mental health professionals, ensuring clinical accuracy while maintaining educational effectiveness.
​
Together, they create a learning ecosystem where evidence-based instructional design methodology connects with specialized mental health training expertise. This combination ensures that my OCD minicourse development benefits from both general instructional design excellence and specific understanding of therapeutic learning needs. The network approach supports continuous professional development while maintaining the clinical rigor essential for effective mental health education where learning outcomes directly impact individual wellbeing and recovery processes.
WEEK 6
Andragogy
Andragogy is the art and science of teaching adults. It popularized by Malcolm Knowles in the 1960s and 1970s, though the term was first coined by German educator Alexander Kapp in 1833. Knowles introduced andragogy to American adult education in his 1968 article "Andragogy, Not Pedagogy!" and later expanded the theory in his influential books "The Modern Practice of Adult Education" (1970) and "The Adult Learner" (1973).
​
Key researchers include Malcolm Knowles (adult learning principles, 1968-1984), Eduard Lindeman (experience-based learning, 1926), and Cyril Houle (learning orientations, 1961). Contemporary contributors include Patricia Cranton (transformative learning), Jack Mezirow (critical reflection), and Sharan Merriam (adult learning contexts).
​
Andragogy distinguishes adult learning from childhood education through six core assumptions: adults are self-directed learners, they bring rich life experiences to learning, their readiness to learn stems from developmental tasks and social roles, they prefer problem-centered rather than subject-centered learning, they are internally motivated, and they need to understand why they're learning something. Unlike children, adults learn best when they can connect new knowledge to existing experiences and see immediate practical applications.
​
Strengths and Limitations in Mental Health Training
Andragogy transforms instructional design by shifting from teacher-centered to learner-centered approaches. Designers must create learning experiences that tap into adults' existing knowledge and experience, allowing learners to contribute their expertise while building new skills. This means designing collaborative environments where learners share experiences and learn from each other.
​
Content relevance becomes critical. Adult learners need to see immediate connections between learning content and their real-world challenges. Instructional designers must clearly communicate the "why" behind learning objectives and provide opportunities for immediate application. Problem-based learning scenarios replace abstract theoretical presentations.
​
Assessment strategies change to emphasize self-reflection and peer feedback rather than traditional testing. Adults prefer to evaluate their own progress against personal and professional goals rather than competing with others. Portfolio-based assessments and reflective journals become more valuable than standardized tests.
​
The instructor's role shifts from information deliverer to facilitator and guide. Designers must create structures that support self-directed learning while providing scaffolding when needed. This includes offering multiple learning pathways and allowing learners to control their pace and approach.
​
Strengths and Limitations in Mental Health Setting
For mental health education contexts like my OCD minicourse, andragogy offers significant advantages while presenting unique considerations for therapeutic learning.
​
Strengths:
-
Adults' life experiences with anxiety and mental health challenges provide rich foundation for learning
-
Self-directed learning aligns with therapy goals of building personal agency and control
-
Problem-centered approach matches the practical nature of learning coping strategies
-
Internal motivation drives adults seeking relief from OCD symptoms to engage deeply with content
-
Peer learning opportunities reduce stigma through shared experiences and mutual support
​
Limitations:
-
Varying levels of readiness to confront anxiety-provoking content may conflict with self-directed principles
-
Previous negative experiences with mental health treatment could create resistance to learning
-
Need for clinical accuracy may limit learner control over content sequencing and depth
-
Crisis situations may require more directive approaches than andragogy typically supports
-
Cultural differences in help-seeking behaviors may clash with Western self-directed learning assumptions
​
Mental health education requires balancing adult learning principles with therapeutic safety considerations, ensuring that learner autonomy doesn't compromise clinical effectiveness or emotional wellbeing.
​
Past Learning Experience
Wooden Spoon Carving (Informal Learning)
My wooden spoon carving journey exemplifies successful informal adult learning. What made this experience memorable and successful was the combination of hands-on practice, mentorship, and community belonging that addressed my intrinsic motivation to create something beautiful and functional with my hands.
​
Self-Direction and Experience: I initially approached spoon carving through trial and error, embodying the adult learner's preference for self-directed exploration. My previous experiences with hand tools and woodworking provided a foundation, but I quickly realized I needed guidance to progress beyond basic attempts.
​
Readiness to Learn: My readiness emerged from a personal desire to disconnect from digital work and engage in tactile, meditative creation. This internal motivation, characteristic of adult learners, drove me to seek out the Central Texas Woodcarvers Association where I could learn from experienced craftspeople.
​
Problem-Centered Learning: Rather than learning abstract woodworking theory, I focused on solving specific problems: How do I hold the knife safely? What wood works best for spoons? How do I achieve smooth curves? Each meeting presented real challenges with immediate practical solutions.
​
Relevance and Immediate Application: Every technique I learned had immediate relevance to my current project. When an 80-year-old carver showed me how to read wood grain, I could immediately apply that knowledge to my spoon-in-progress. This relevance kept me engaged and motivated.
​
Internal Motivation: My motivation came entirely from within—the satisfaction of creating functional art, the meditative quality of carving, and the joy of learning traditional crafts. No external rewards or requirements drove my learning, making it deeply personal and sustainable.
​
Respect for Experience: The master carvers valued my questions and treated me as a capable adult learner rather than a child needing instruction. They shared decades of accumulated wisdom while respecting my own problem-solving abilities and creative vision.
​
Learning Preferences and PLN Impact
This experience revealed my strong preference for informal learning combined with mentorship-based knowledge transfer. I thrive in environments where I can:
-
Learn through direct hands-on practice
-
Access expert knowledge through personal relationships
-
Control my learning pace and focus areas
-
Apply learning immediately to real projects
-
Learn within a supportive community of practice
​
My preference for informal, mentorship-based learning will shape my PLN engagement in three key ways:
-
Active Relationship Building: Rather than passively consuming content from The Learning Guild or Cathy Moore's blog, I'll seek direct interaction through conference conversations, discussion forum participation, and reaching out to experienced designers for guidance on specific challenges.
-
Practical Knowledge Sharing: Just as the woodcarvers shared accumulated tips and tricks, I'll contribute real-world examples from my OCD minicourse development rather than theoretical discussions, offering hands-on insights from my actual design experiences.
-
Community-Focused Learning: I'll prioritize PLN resources offering practical application—workshops, design challenges, case studies—over purely theoretical content, building genuine relationships that foster mutual support and knowledge sharing rather than simply collecting connections.
WEEK 7
Assessment & Learning Models: Constructivist Learning Activity: ERP Hierarchy Construction
Learning Model: Constructivism
Reasoning: Constructivism emphasizes learner-centered knowledge construction through active engagement, prior experience integration, and collaborative meaning-making.
​
Learning Context, Objective and Activity
Adult learners with OCD participate in Module 3 of the "Mastering OCD" minicourse, focusing on building personalized Exposure Response Prevention (ERP) hierarchies.​
-
Learning Objective: Learners will construct a personalized 10-step ERP exposure hierarchy by analyzing their specific OCD triggers, experimenting with anxiety rating scales, and iteratively refining their approach based on self-reflection and peer feedback through discussion forums.​
-
Activity: Learners begin by exploring interactive case studies representing different OCD types (contamination, checking, symmetry) through branching scenarios in Articulate Storyline. Rather than being told the "correct" hierarchy structure, learners actively construct understanding by manipulating anxiety rating variables and observing outcomes through realistic simulations.​
-
Using progressively scaffolded templates, learners build their own exposure hierarchies. Initial templates provide detailed guidance and examples, while later versions offer minimal structure, allowing learners to construct increasingly sophisticated approaches based on their developing understanding. Throughout the process, learners engage in guided self-reflection through journal prompts that help them connect course concepts to personal OCD patterns.​
-
The activity culminates in optional discussion forum sharing where learners can anonymously post insights about their hierarchy construction process, ask questions, and learn from peer experiences while maintaining privacy about specific triggers.
-
​
Formative Assessment
Weekly Check-In Reflection Journal
Learners complete guided reflection prompts throughout their hierarchy construction process, answering questions such as:
-
"What surprised you about rating your anxiety levels this week?"
-
"How did your hierarchy change as you learned more about gradual exposure?"
-
"What challenges are you facing in ordering your exposures from least to most anxiety-provoking?"
Purpose: This ongoing assessment allows learners to monitor their own understanding development while providing instructors insight into misconceptions or areas needing additional support. The reflective nature aligns with constructivist principles of metacognitive awareness and self-directed learning.
​
Summative Assessment
Completed Personal ERP Hierarchy Portfolio
Learners submit a comprehensive portfolio containing their finalized 10-step exposure hierarchy, rationale for ranking decisions, anticipated challenges, and planned implementation timeline. The portfolio includes reflection on their construction process and how their understanding evolved throughout the module.
-
Purpose: This assessment evaluates learners' ability to synthesize learning into a practical, personalized tool while demonstrating understanding of ERP principles through their hierarchy design choices and explanatory rationale.
Authentic Assessment
Real-World Implementation Tracking and Peer Mentoring
Student-Centered Elements:
-
Personal Relevance: Learners apply their constructed hierarchy to actual exposure practice in their daily lives
-
Self-Direction: Learners choose which exposures to attempt and when, controlling their learning pace
-
Real-World Application: Assessment occurs through actual anxiety management rather than theoretical testing
Assessment Process:
Learners implement one exposure from their hierarchy in their real environment and document the experience through a structured reflection process. They track anxiety levels before, during, and after the exposure, note any modifications needed to their hierarchy, and reflect on what they learned about their OCD patterns.
​
Following their real-world practice, learners engage in peer mentoring by sharing anonymized insights in discussion forums, offering support to others attempting similar exposures, and contributing to collective knowledge about effective exposure strategies.
​
Authenticity Connection: This assessment directly mirrors the real-world application learners will need post-course - implementing ERP techniques in their daily lives while building support networks for sustained recovery. The assessment measures actual behavioral change rather than knowledge recall, aligning with therapeutic goals.
​
The authentic assessment embodies constructivist principles by:
-
Having learners construct knowledge through direct experience
-
Building on prior personal experiences with anxiety
-
Creating meaning through reflection and peer interaction
-
Emphasizing process over product
-
Supporting individual knowledge construction while benefiting from collective wisdom
Connections to Learning Theory
Primary Theory: Constructivism
The learning scenario demonstrates key constructivist principles:
-
Active Knowledge Construction: Rather than receiving pre-made hierarchies, learners actively build their own understanding through experimentation with anxiety ratings and exposure sequencing. They construct meaning by manipulating variables and observing consequences in realistic scenarios.
-
Prior Experience Integration: The activity explicitly builds on learners' existing experiences with OCD symptoms and anxiety management attempts. Their personal history becomes the foundation for new learning rather than an obstacle to overcome.
-
Social Construction: The discussion forum component allows learners to construct knowledge collaboratively while maintaining privacy. Peer insights and shared experiences contribute to individual understanding development.
-
Scaffolded Learning: The progressive template structure provides support when needed while gradually releasing control to learners as their competence grows, supporting the Zone of Proximal Development concept.
-
Metacognitive Reflection: Ongoing journal prompts and reflection requirements help learners become aware of their own thinking processes and learning development.
Supporting Theories:
-
Experiential Learning (Kolb): The authentic assessment creates a complete experiential cycle - concrete experience (real exposure), reflective observation (post-exposure analysis), abstract conceptualization (hierarchy refinement), and active experimentation (next exposure attempts).
-
Adult Learning Theory (Andragogy): The scenario respects adult learners' need for self-direction, problem-centered learning, and immediate relevance to personal challenges. Learners control their pace and focus areas while addressing real-world problems.
-
Social Learning Theory: Peer interaction through discussion forums allows learners to observe others' strategies and model successful approaches while contributing their own insights to the learning community.
WEEK 8
Signature Assignment - Minicourse Idea and Learning Theory Connection
​
Idea for My Minicourse
I'm developing a minicourse titled "Mastering Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD): A Path to Empowerment Through Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP)" that addresses a significant gap in accessible mental health education. While OCD affects over 3 million Americans and 70 million people worldwide, many individuals struggle to access effective, evidence-based treatment strategies.
​
My course focuses specifically on ERP therapy - the gold standard treatment with 80-90% effectiveness rates - but presents it through an engaging superhero metaphor that makes clinical concepts approachable for teens and adults. The minicourse transforms abstract therapeutic techniques into concrete "superpowers" learners can understand and apply: Exposure becomes their "Courage Superpower" and Response Prevention becomes their "Resistance Superpower."
​
What makes this course unique is its dual audience approach, serving both individuals with OCD and their support networks (family and friends). The gamified design reduces the stigma often associated with mental health treatment while providing scientifically-backed strategies that learners can implement immediately. The course fills a crucial gap by making professional-level ERP techniques accessible outside traditional therapy settings, potentially reaching underserved populations who lack access to specialized OCD treatment.
​
Learning Theory Connections
Constructivism
Constructivism aligns perfectly with ERP's core principle that learners must actively build their own understanding of anxiety management. The theory's emphasis on learners constructing knowledge through experience directly supports ERP's hands-on approach. In my course, learners don't just read about facing fears—they actively engage with exposure exercises and build personal "fear ladders" based on their unique OCD manifestations. This active construction of knowledge is essential because OCD recovery can't be passively absorbed; it must be experientially built through practice.
​
The main limitation lies in the potential for learners to construct inaccurate or harmful interpretations of ERP techniques. Since OCD often involves cognitive distortions, learners might misapply exposure exercises or avoid necessary challenges. Without proper scaffolding, the constructivist approach could allow learners to reinforce avoidance behaviors rather than confronting them.
​
I'm implementing constructivism through interactive "Fear Ladder Builder" tools where learners create personalized exposure hierarchies ranked from easiest to most challenging. Learners engage in guided self-reflection journals, constructing their own insights about progress patterns. The course includes scenario-based learning where learners practice ERP decision-making in branching narratives, building their own understanding of how different choices affect anxiety levels. Assessment involves learners creating personal action plans rather than simply completing traditional quizzes, allowing them to construct their own roadmap to recovery.
​
Connectivism
Connectivism addresses the isolation many people with OCD experience by emphasizing learning through networks and connections. The theory's focus on collective knowledge creation perfectly supports my inclusion of peer discussion forums where learners can share experiences and strategies. When learners connect with others who've faced similar challenges, it creates a powerful knowledge network that extends beyond individual learning. The theory's emphasis on pattern recognition helps learners identify connections between different coping strategies and understand which approaches work best in various contexts.
​
The primary limitation is ensuring quality control in peer-generated content. Without proper moderation, misinformation could spread through the network, potentially reinforcing harmful behaviors. Additionally, the open networking aspect might intimidate learners who aren't ready to share their experiences, creating barriers rather than support. There's also the challenge of maintaining clinical boundaries and ensuring evidence-based practice when learners prioritize peer advice over professional guidance.
I'm incorporating Connectivism through moderated discussion forums where learners can anonymously share insights about their progress and learn from collective experiences. The course includes a resource-sharing network where learners contribute effective coping strategies to a collective knowledge base. I'm designing optional peer mentoring opportunities where advanced learners can guide newcomers, creating ongoing learning networks. The gamification elements include community achievement boards where learners celebrate milestones together, fostering collective knowledge creation. Additionally, I'm connecting learners to external professional networks and resources, helping them build their own Personal Learning Networks (PLNs) for sustained support beyond the course.
​
Both theories complement each other beautifully - constructivism ensures learners actively build personalized recovery strategies through hands-on experience, while connectivism provides the networked support and collective wisdom necessary for sustained motivation and continued learning. Together, they create a comprehensive learning environment that addresses both individual knowledge construction and community-supported growth.